Fake install fraud on affiliate CPC campaigns
Fake installs are primarily a CPI fraud type, but CPC programmes linking to app stores or app download landing pages can be targeted by publishers who click affiliate links to generate fake download attempts.
Trusted by leading brands worldwide






































CPC affiliate campaigns directing to app store pages attract publisher-generated fake app click traffic
Fake installs are most closely associated with CPI affiliate models, but CPC affiliate campaigns that link to app store pages or app download landing pages attract a related form of fraud: publishers generate fraudulent clicks to your app store affiliate link to collect the CPC commission, without any real user ever intending to download the app. The click triggers the CPC commission. The publisher earns the payout. And your attribution data shows app store-directed traffic that delivers zero actual installs, making your CPC campaign look completely inefficient for app download purposes.
When app-directed CPC campaigns are subject to this type of publisher-driven click fraud, the performance data for your CPC programme appears to show a severe disconnect between clicks and app downloads. This disconnect is sometimes misdiagnosed as a landing page or creative effectiveness problem rather than as fraud. Your team invests time and resource optimising your app store page or creative assets against what is actually a fraudulent traffic problem. Tapper analyses click quality signals and downstream engagement data to identify the publisher traffic generating fraudulent app-directed CPC clicks versus genuine user traffic that simply did not convert.
How Tapper stops fake installs on Affiliate cpc campaigns
Three steps from connection to clean campaign data, no engineering required.
01
Connect your CPC affiliate tracking and app analytics to Tapper
Tapper integrates with your affiliate CPC tracking platform and, where available, your app analytics or MMP, monitoring click quality and downstream install behaviour for app-directed CPC campaigns.
02
Publisher-driven fake app click patterns detected
Click-level behavioural analysis, session quality scoring, and downstream engagement data identify publishers generating fraudulent app-directed CPC clicks versus genuine audience traffic, even without direct install-level data.
03
Fraudulent app-directed CPC publishers flagged and excluded
Publishers generating fraudulent app-directed CPC clicks are flagged with evidence, enabling you to exclude their traffic from commission-eligible events and redirect your CPC budget toward publishers driving genuine app interest.
Fake installs on Affiliate cpc campaigns by the numbers
Data from Tapper's platform analysis and published industry research.
10-15%
Of affiliate spend lost to fraud on average
28%
Of mobile installs are fraudulent globally on average
64%
Of affiliate programmes experience significant fraud
0.1%
Tapper false positive rate
Tapper vs Affiliate Network Fraud Detection
See exactly where the gaps are, and why they matter to your cpc campaigns performance.
App-directed CPC click quality analysis
Click behavioural scoring and downstream engagement data
Click-level aggregate volume checks only
Publisher fraud detection for app CPC campaigns
Per-publisher fake app click pattern identification
No publisher-level click quality analysis
MMP integration where available
Cross-references CPC click data with MMP downstream install signals
Network-native data only
Pre-payment rejection of fake app CPC clicks
Fraudulent app-directed clicks excluded before CPC commission calculated
Dispute process after payout
Trusted by industry leaders
See how companies are protecting their ad budgets and improving ROI with Tapper.
“Tapper played a key role in improving the efficiency of Du's performance marketing activity by addressing traffic quality issues within campaigns. Following implementation, Du achieved a 13% reduction in CPA and an 8.6% increase in order rate, demonstrating a clear improvement in conversion quality and overall campaign effectiveness.”

Joseph Elbcherrawy
Client Leadership Director, Mindshare, a WPP Media Brand

“During our Tapper trial for INFINITI, we uncovered low-quality traffic that wasn't visible inside the platforms. Removing it delivered a 14% uplift in conversions and an 11.4% reduction in CPA - a meaningful efficiency gain for INFINITI's 2026 growth plans.”
David Barnes
Data & Technology Lead, Omnicom Group

“With Tapper's protection we were able to identify and block invalid clicks in real time. The impact was immediate as our cost per acquisition dropped by 30% and ROAS improved significantly. More importantly, Tapper gives us the confidence that our campaigns are reaching genuine customers, which makes it truly invaluable.”

Dimitris Bakas
Senior Performance Marketing, Public Group

“We started using Tapper to get better visibility on where our clicks were coming from, and ended up cutting wasted spend by over 12%. The performance uplift was clear, and for the first time, we could trust the numbers we were seeing. It's a total game-changer for campaign integrity.”

Stuart Parkin
Director of Operations, Regit
“Tapper's blocking technology purifies our paid media traffic which roughly equates to a 36x return against its subscription costs. It's certainly one of the easiest-to-implement tools in our entire marketing stack.”

Reno Mindemann
Head of Growth, Kama Capital

“We've been using Tapper for over a year now, and it has become a core part of how we run paid media. Invalid traffic was always something we knew existed but couldn't really act on. Tapper changed that. We're now saving up to $50K per year, and on PureSquare specifically, we saw around a 20% decrease in CPA. Based on these results, we decided to roll it out across other ventures under Disrupt as well.”
Nurkan Kirkan
GTM Consultant / Paid Growth, Disrupt.com
Trusted by leading brands worldwide






Frequently asked questions
Everything about fake installs on Affiliate cpc campaigns.
On a CPI campaign, fake installs directly trigger install-level commission. On a CPC campaign directed to an app store, the fraud operates at the click level: publishers generate fraudulent clicks to the app store link, collect the CPC commission, and the fake intent is revealed only when your app download data shows near-zero install conversion from that publisher's traffic. The fraud is CPC-level but its symptom resembles a low-converting app store campaign.
The key diagnostic is publisher-level variation. If specific publishers show dramatically lower click-to-download rates while other publishers on the same campaign show normal conversion patterns, the low-converting publishers are likely generating fraudulent clicks rather than delivering a poor creative experience. Tapper provides per-publisher click quality scoring to identify these patterns without requiring manual analysis across your publisher roster.
CPI models shift the fraud risk from click-level to install-level. Both models require active fraud monitoring: CPC for fraudulent click generation and CPI for fake install generation. The choice between CPC and CPI for app campaigns depends on your risk tolerance and programme economics. Tapper protects both models, and our team can advise on the fraud risk profile differences between CPC and CPI for your specific app category.
Other fraud types on Affiliate cpc campaigns
CPC campaigns campaigns face multiple fraud threats. Tapper protects against all of them.
Stop fake installs on your Affiliate cpc campaigns
Book a demo and we will show you exactly what Tapper would block on your account, before you commit to anything.