Tapper
AlertsPricing
Display & programmatic
Programmatic guaranteed
SDK spoofing

SDK spoofing on programmatic guaranteed campaigns

Programmatic guaranteed offers the lowest programmatic invalid traffic risk, but SDK spoofing operates at the attribution layer independently of deal quality, making attribution chain monitoring essential even for premium publisher deals.

Trusted by leading brands worldwide

Tiffany & Co.
Adidas
Azadea
Punt Roma
Salsa Jeans
Sunglass Hut
Decathlon
Honda
Lexus
Mercedes-Benz
TOD
Toyota
Volvo
STC
Porsche
Almosafer
Infiniti
LEGOLAND
Cleveland Clinic
Nissan
Boggi Milano
Kiko Milano
Hyundai
Chevrolet
Aape
Kiabi
Maje Paris
Sandro
Ted Baker
ACE
Tawuniya
TOEFL
Regit
You.gr
Spitishop

SDK spoofing bypasses deal quality entirely by attacking the attribution layer rather than the inventory layer

Programmatic guaranteed deals represent the highest-trust tier of programmatic buying, but SDK spoofing is uniquely indifferent to deal quality because it operates at the attribution layer rather than the inventory layer. A bad actor does not need to access or compromise your programmatic guaranteed publisher's inventory to execute SDK spoofing. They only need access to your MMP's attribution signal format, which they obtain by reverse-engineering the SDK. A perfectly legitimate programmatic guaranteed impression can be accompanied by a separately transmitted spoofed SDK signal that claims an invalid install on top of the genuine ad delivery.

The risk of SDK spoofing on programmatic guaranteed campaigns is lower in absolute volume than on open exchange, because the smaller impression volumes of guaranteed deals limit the scale at which spoofing operations can generate fake installs without creating detectable statistical anomalies. However, the premium CPMs of guaranteed deals mean that any spoofed install attributed to this inventory costs significantly more to the advertiser than the same spoofing on cheaper inventory tiers. Attribution chain monitoring ensures that the integrity of your highest-quality programmatic investment is verified at every level.

How Tapper stops sdk spoofing on Display programmatic guaranteed

Three steps from connection to clean campaign data, no engineering required.

01

Connect your DSP, guaranteed deals, and MMP to Tapper

Tapper integrates with your full programmatic guaranteed stack, monitoring attribution signals from guaranteed publisher impressions through to MMP install data for any SDK spoofing patterns.

02

Spoofed attribution signals identified alongside guaranteed impressions

Device signal consistency checks, install timing distribution analysis, and post-install behavioral scoring identify SDK spoofing patterns linked to guaranteed deal attribution, including low-volume incidents specific to premium inventory contexts.

03

Spoofed installs excluded and guaranteed deal attribution corrected

Any identified SDK-spoofed installs attributed to programmatic guaranteed placements are flagged and excluded from your CPI calculations, with attribution data corrected to reflect genuine install performance.

SDK spoofing on Display programmatic guaranteed by the numbers

Data from Tapper's platform analysis and published industry research.

20-40%

Average IVT rate on open exchange programmatic

40%

Of invalid mobile traffic uses SDK spoofing to generate fake installs

90%

SDK spoofing detection rate by Tapper

$84B

Lost globally to invalid traffic annually

Tapper vs standard brand safety tools

Capability
Tapper
Standard brand safety tools

SDK spoofing detection on guaranteed deals

Tapper

Attribution chain analysis independent of deal quality tier

Standard brand safety tools

No SDK-level monitoring capability

Attribution layer vs inventory layer protection

Tapper

Monitors attribution signals separately from inventory quality

Standard brand safety tools

Brand safety tools only cover inventory content layer

MMP integration for guaranteed campaigns

Tapper

Cross-references DSP and MMP data per guaranteed impression and install event

Standard brand safety tools

No MMP integration

Guaranteed deal CPI integrity

Tapper

Spoofed installs excluded from guaranteed deal CPI reporting

Standard brand safety tools

CPI reporting includes all attributed installs regardless of traffic quality

Case studies

Leading brands growing with Tapper

See how companies are protecting their ad budgets and improving ROI with Tapper.

Frequently asked questions

SDK spoofing operates at the attribution layer, independently of the publisher relationship. A bad actor intercepts knowledge of your MMP's attribution signals and transmits fabricated install events directly to your measurement partner, without needing access to the publisher's inventory. The guaranteed publisher may be entirely legitimate while SDK spoofing claims invalid installs against the attribution events associated with that publisher's delivery.

Because SDK spoofing bypasses the inventory quality controls that differentiate programmatic deal tiers, the lower overall invalid traffic risk of guaranteed deals does not eliminate SDK spoofing risk. Additionally, the higher CPMs of guaranteed deals mean that any spoofed install attributed to this inventory carries a greater cost per invalid event than the same attack on cheaper inventory. Attribution chain monitoring closes the gap between inventory quality and attribution integrity.

No. Tapper integrates with your existing MMP configuration (AppsFlyer, Adjust, Kochava, Singular, or Branch) without requiring changes to your attribution setup. The analysis layer operates alongside your existing MMP, cross-referencing the data it collects against the DSP impression data from your guaranteed deals to identify spoofing patterns without disrupting your attribution infrastructure.

Stop sdk spoofing on your Display programmatic guaranteed

Get a demo and we will show you exactly what Tapper would block on your account, before you commit to anything.