Verify every impression in programmatic guaranteed campaigns
Programmatic guaranteed commits your budget to fixed impression volumes from a named publisher at a negotiated price, but a signed deal does not guarantee clean traffic. Invalid impressions, viewability gaps, and audience delivery shortfalls can all erode the value of a guaranteed buy. Tapper holds every delivery to the standard you paid for.
Trusted by leading brands worldwide
Guaranteed does not mean verified, and delivery shortfalls are rarely caught without independent monitoring
Programmatic guaranteed deals are the closest the programmatic ecosystem comes to traditional direct IO buying. A fixed CPM, a committed impression volume, an agreed placement, and a named publisher make PG the premium tier of programmatic. But the mechanisms that make PG feel secure, the direct relationship, the signed deal, the committed inventory, do not independently verify that each impression delivered meets the specification agreed. Publishers can fulfil impression volume commitments with lower-quality placements from sub-properties, serve impressions at times or in contexts that do not reflect the audiences negotiated, or deliver against weaker viewability standards than were implied in the deal without your reporting system flagging the discrepancy.
Invalid traffic is a less severe problem in programmatic guaranteed than in open exchange, but it is not absent. Publishers with mixed traffic quality across their network can inadvertently or deliberately route PG impression delivery through placements that carry higher invalid traffic rates. Sophisticated bot networks operating through residential proxies can penetrate even curated PG inventory. Click stuffing and interaction fraud are known to occur on premium publisher placements where advertiser attention and CPM levels are highest, precisely because the financial return per fraudulent interaction is greatest. Standard brand safety tools screen content but have no mechanism for verifying impression delivery quality at the individual event level.
The consequences of undetected delivery shortfalls in a programmatic guaranteed context are financial and strategic. If a PG campaign delivers 15 percent of its committed impressions through invalid traffic or misrepresented placements, you have overpaid for the deal relative to genuine delivery. If audience quality does not match what was negotiated, the CPM premium you paid for contextual targeting or audience segment access is not justified. Without independent impression-level monitoring, you have no basis for identifying where the deal underperformed or for holding the publisher accountable. Tapper provides the verification layer that turns a publisher's delivery confirmation into independently audited campaign performance data.
How Tapper protects your programmatic guaranteed on Display
Three steps from connection to clean campaign data, no engineering required.
01
Map your programmatic guaranteed deal parameters
Tapper integrates with your DSP and maps the specific placement, audience, and delivery specifications from your PG deal, creating a baseline against which every delivered impression is measured.
02
Every impression verified against deal specifications
Traffic quality analysis, placement verification, viewability signal monitoring, and audience consistency checks run on each impression delivered under the PG deal, flagging deviations from agreed specifications.
03
Delivery audit data provided for publisher accountability
Tapper generates a deal-level delivery audit showing the proportion of impressions that met agreed specifications, the breakdown of any invalid or non-conforming traffic, and the adjusted effective CPM based on verified delivery, giving you the data needed for publisher conversations and future deal negotiation.
Programmatic guaranteed fraud by the numbers
Data from Tapper's platform analysis and published industry research.
$45+
Average CPM on programmatic guaranteed premium placements
12-18%
Estimated delivery shortfall rate on unmonitored PG campaigns
$84B
Lost to ad fraud globally each year across all programmatic
40%
Of advertisers unaware of delivery discrepancies in guaranteed buys
Tapper vs Standard Brand Safety Tools
See exactly where the gaps are, and why they matter to your campaign performance.
Impression-level delivery verification
Every PG impression checked against deal specifications
No impression-level delivery auditing
Viewability signal monitoring
Per-impression viewability signal analysis
Post-campaign viewability reporting only
Audience delivery consistency
Signal-level audience verification against deal segment
No audience integrity verification
Invalid traffic on premium inventory
Detects SIVT including residential proxy and click stuffing on PG placements
GIVT filtering only, misses sophisticated fraud
Deal audit reporting
Full delivery audit with adjusted effective CPM calculation
No publisher-facing delivery evidence
Sub-property delivery detection
Identifies impressions served from lower-quality publisher sub-properties
Declared domain screened, sub-property routing not detected
Publisher accountability data
Impression-level evidence for deal renegotiation and shortfall claims
No actionable publisher accountability data
Real-time alerting on delivery issues
Alerts when delivery falls below deal specifications mid-campaign
No mid-campaign delivery monitoring
Trusted by industry leaders
See how companies are protecting their ad budgets and improving ROI with Tapper.
“Tapper played a key role in improving the efficiency of Du's performance marketing activity by addressing traffic quality issues within campaigns. Following implementation, Du achieved a 13% reduction in CPA and an 8.6% increase in order rate, demonstrating a clear improvement in conversion quality and overall campaign effectiveness.”
Joseph Elbcherrawy
Client Leadership Director, Mindshare, a WPP Media Brand
“During our Tapper trial for INFINITI, we uncovered low-quality traffic that wasn't visible inside the platforms. Removing it delivered a 14% uplift in conversions and an 11.4% reduction in CPA - a meaningful efficiency gain for INFINITI's 2026 growth plans.”
David Barnes
Data & Technology Lead, Omnicom Group
“With Tapper's protection we were able to identify and block invalid clicks in real time. The impact was immediate as our cost per acquisition dropped by 30% and ROAS improved significantly. More importantly, Tapper gives us the confidence that our campaigns are reaching genuine customers, which makes it truly invaluable.”
Dimitris Bakas
Senior Performance Marketing, Public Group
“We started using Tapper to get better visibility on where our clicks were coming from, and ended up cutting wasted spend by over 12%. The performance uplift was clear, and for the first time, we could trust the numbers we were seeing. It's a total game-changer for campaign integrity.”
Stuart Parkin
Director of Operations, Regit
“Tapper's blocking technology purifies our paid media traffic which roughly equates to a 36x return against its subscription costs. It's certainly one of the easiest-to-implement tools in our entire marketing stack.”
Reno Mindemann
Head of Growth, Kama Capital
“We've been using Tapper for over a year now, and it has become a core part of how we run paid media. Invalid traffic was always something we knew existed but couldn't really act on. Tapper changed that. We're now saving up to $50K per year, and on PureSquare specifically, we saw around a 20% decrease in CPA. Based on these results, we decided to roll it out across other ventures under Disrupt as well.”
Nurkan Kirkan
GTM Consultant / Paid Growth, Disrupt.com
Trusted by leading brands worldwide
Frequently asked questions
Everything you need to know about protecting your programmatic guaranteed on Display & Programmatic.
A signed PG deal commits a publisher to deliver a fixed volume of impressions at an agreed CPM and placement specification. It does not independently verify that each impression delivered meets that specification. Invalid traffic, sub-property delivery, and audience misrepresentation can all occur within a PG campaign without your DSP reporting system flagging the issue. Independent monitoring is the only way to confirm that what was delivered matches what was agreed.
The most common issues in PG campaigns are audience delivery discrepancies, where the traffic delivered does not match the audience segment negotiated, sub-property delivery, where impressions are fulfilled from lower-quality placements in the publisher's network rather than the specified placement, and sophisticated invalid traffic including click stuffing and residential proxy traffic. Outright bot fraud is less common in PG than in open exchange but is not absent, particularly on high-value placements where the return per fraudulent impression is greatest.
Tapper measures the proportion of PG impressions that meet agreed delivery specifications, including traffic quality, placement, and audience consistency. The adjusted effective CPM is calculated by dividing total deal spend by the number of verified, specification-conforming impressions. If 15 percent of delivered impressions fail quality checks, your adjusted CPM is approximately 18 percent higher than the negotiated rate, reflecting the genuine cost of the valid delivery you received.
Yes. Tapper generates impression-level delivery audit data that specifies which impressions failed quality checks, what the failure reason was, and the aggregate delivery shortfall as a percentage of committed volume. This data can be shared directly with publishers as the basis for shortfall claims, make-good requests, or CPM adjustments. Having independent third-party audit data rather than self-reported publisher data significantly strengthens your position in those conversations.
Yes. Programmatic guaranteed CPMs are typically the highest in the programmatic stack, reflecting premium placement and audience commitments. When invalid traffic or delivery discrepancies occur at those CPM levels, the absolute spend waste per fraudulent impression is greater than at open exchange or even PMP rates. A 10 percent invalid traffic rate on a $50 CPM PG deal costs five times as much per impression as the same rate on a $10 PMP deal.
Yes. Tapper provides real-time alerting when delivery quality falls below configurable thresholds during a live PG campaign. This allows you to raise delivery issues with the publisher while the campaign is running, rather than discovering shortfalls after the budget has been fully spent and the campaign has ended.
Other campaign types on Display & Programmatic
Each campaign type has its own fraud patterns. Tapper covers them all on Display.
Stop paying for fraud on Display programmatic guaranteed
Book a demo and we will show you exactly what Tapper would block on your account, before you commit to anything.