WPP Media MENA boosts client campaign efficiency with Tapper Partnership

Tapper
Pricing
LoginGet a demoStart free trial
Mobile App
Insurance

Mobile app ad fraud protection for insurance

Fake installs and post-install event fraud on insurance app campaigns inflate your cost per quote, corrupt lead quality data, and waste budget that should be reaching real policyholders.

Get a demo

Trusted by leading brands worldwide

Dominos
STC
Porsche
Almosafer
Infiniti
Marks & Spencer
LEGOLAND
du
Parfums de Marly
Cleveland Clinic
Public Group
Magrabi Retail Group
DKNY
SACO
TOEFL
Regit
Kama
Arabian Dyar
ITE Events
You.gr
Spitishop
Dominos
STC
Porsche
Almosafer
Infiniti
Marks & Spencer
LEGOLAND
du
Parfums de Marly
Cleveland Clinic
Public Group
Magrabi Retail Group
DKNY
SACO
TOEFL
Regit
Kama
Arabian Dyar
ITE Events
You.gr
Spitishop

Insurance app UA fraud inflates cost-per-quote and corrupts lead pipeline data

Insurance mobile apps have a UA funnel that makes them particularly vulnerable to post-install event fraud. Quote requests, policy comparisons, and application initiation events are the conversion signals insurance UA campaigns optimise toward, and fraudsters simulate precisely these interactions because they trigger the CPA payouts that make targeting insurance apps profitable. Your MMP registers quote requests. Your pipeline finds no corresponding real applicant because the user was never a human considering a policy.

The problem compounds when fraudulent quote data enters your pricing and product analytics. Insurance product teams use quote conversion data to understand which product types, coverage levels, and price points resonate with specific customer segments. When fraudulent quote events are included in that data, product decisions are made on a signal that does not reflect real consumer intent. Distribution optimisation built on corrupted funnel data produces underperforming campaigns that deliver real policyholders at higher-than-expected cost.

Lead quality scoring for insurance apps is also at risk. Because insurance distribution often involves broker or agent follow-up after app-initiated quotes, fraudulent installs that generate fake quote events enter the lead pipeline and consume sales team capacity. A proportion of sales effort is directed at non-existent prospects while real applicants wait longer for follow-up. The operational cost of fraudulent leads in insurance extends well beyond the media spend wasted on the initial acquisition.

How Tapper protects insurance advertisers on Mobile

Three steps from connection to clean data, no engineering required.

01

Connect Tapper to your MMP and insurance app UA campaigns

Tapper integrates with your MMP and ad network accounts, monitoring click and install traffic across all insurance app acquisition and re-engagement campaigns from day one.

02

Fake installs and simulated quote events identified

SDK spoofing signatures, device farm cluster analysis, and simulated quote and application initiation events are flagged in real time before they trigger CPA payouts or enter your lead pipeline.

03

Cost per genuine quote reflects real applicant acquisition

With fraudulent installs and simulated events excluded, your cost-per-quote and lead pipeline data are anchored to real users expressing genuine interest. UA budget is directed toward channels that deliver real policyholders.

Ad fraud in insurance by the numbers

Data from Tapper's platform analysis and published industry research.

28%

Of mobile installs are fraudulent on average

$10B

Lost to mobile ad fraud globally in 2023

40%

Of mobile fraud uses SDK spoofing to simulate post-install events

$3.60

Saved for every $1 invested in mobile fraud protection

IVT Calculator

How much are you losing to click fraud?

Based on a 16% fraud rate for Insurance on Mobile App. Move the slider to see your estimated monthly loss.

Industry

Insurance

16% fraud rate

Monthly spend

$1,000

Avg. cost per install (CPI) (optional)

Your estimated numbers


Monthly fraud loss

$160


Annual fraud loss

$1,920


Monthly budget recovered with Tapper

$136


Start for free

Tapper vs MMP Built-in Fraud Protection

See exactly where the gaps are, and why they matter to your insurance campaigns.

Capability
Tapper
MMP Built-in Fraud Protection

SDK spoofing detection

Full session lifecycle behavioural analysis

Device signal matching only

Simulated quote event detection

Post-install event behavioural scoring

Install-level checks only

Cost-per-quote accuracy

Fraudulent installs excluded from lead counts

Fake quote events inflate cost metrics

Lead pipeline integrity

Only real applicants enter the sales pipeline

Fraudulent leads consume sales capacity

Device farm detection

Cross-device cluster and network analysis

Device ID blacklisting only

Detection speed

Under 3 seconds per click and install event

Post-attribution batch review

Success stories

Trusted by industry leaders

See how companies are protecting their ad budgets and improving ROI with Tapper.

Tapper played a key role in improving the efficiency of Du's performance marketing activity by addressing traffic quality issues within campaigns. Following implementation, Du achieved a 13% reduction in CPA and an 8.6% increase in order rate, demonstrating a clear improvement in conversion quality and overall campaign effectiveness.

Joseph Elbcherrawy

Joseph Elbcherrawy

Client Leadership Director, Mindshare, a WPP Media Brand

Mindshare, a WPP Media Brand

During our Tapper trial for INFINITI, we uncovered low-quality traffic that wasn't visible inside the platforms. Removing it delivered a 14% uplift in conversions and an 11.4% reduction in CPA - a meaningful efficiency gain for INFINITI's 2026 growth plans.

David Barnes

David Barnes

Data & Technology Lead, Omnicom Group

Omnicom Group

With Tapper's protection we were able to identify and block invalid clicks in real time. The impact was immediate as our cost per acquisition dropped by 30% and ROAS improved significantly. More importantly, Tapper gives us the confidence that our campaigns are reaching genuine customers, which makes it truly invaluable.

Dimitris Bakas

Dimitris Bakas

Senior Performance Marketing, Public Group

Public Group

We started using Tapper to get better visibility on where our clicks were coming from, and ended up cutting wasted spend by over 12%. The performance uplift was clear, and for the first time, we could trust the numbers we were seeing. It's a total game-changer for campaign integrity.

Stuart Parkin

Stuart Parkin

Director of Operations, Regit

Regit

Tapper's blocking technology purifies our paid media traffic which roughly equates to a 36x return against its subscription costs. It's certainly one of the easiest-to-implement tools in our entire marketing stack.

Reno Mindemann

Reno Mindemann

Head of Growth, Kama Capital

Kama Capital

We've been using Tapper for over a year now, and it has become a core part of how we run paid media. Invalid traffic was always something we knew existed but couldn't really act on. Tapper changed that. We're now saving up to $50K per year, and on PureSquare specifically, we saw around a 20% decrease in CPA. Based on these results, we decided to roll it out across other ventures under Disrupt as well.

Nurkan Kirkan

Nurkan Kirkan

GTM Consultant / Paid Growth, Disrupt.com

Disrupt.com

Trusted by leading brands worldwide

Infiniti
Dominos
TOEFL
STC
Public Group
Almosafer
Porsche

Frequently asked questions

Everything you need to know about protecting insurance ad spend on Mobile App.

Insurance app UA campaigns optimised toward quote request or application events pay out CPA bonuses when those events are registered by the MMP. Fraudsters simulate these events after generating fake installs, triggering payouts without any real user involvement. Your analytics show quote request volume that your sales team cannot convert because the underlying users do not exist.

Beyond the media spend wasted on fraudulent installs, fake quote events that enter the sales pipeline consume broker and agent time on follow-up attempts with non-existent prospects. For insurance businesses where sales cost is significant per policy, the operational waste from fraudulent leads adds a multiplier effect to the media cost of mobile fraud.

Quote and application data from fraudulent installs enters the product analytics used to understand consumer preference for coverage types, price points, and product structures. Decisions on product development, pricing, and distribution optimisation made on this data reflect fraud patterns rather than genuine consumer intent, leading to product and pricing decisions that underperform in the real market.

Yes. Tapper monitors click and event traffic across both install campaigns and re-engagement campaigns. Fraud on re-engagement campaigns typically takes the form of click stuffing against deeplink tracking URLs, where fraudulent clicks intercept returning users to claim attribution credit for natural re-engagement. Tapper's click velocity and pattern analysis covers both campaign types.

No. Tapper integrates alongside your existing MMP without requiring changes to your current attribution setup. Connection is made at the MMP API and campaign tracking link level. You continue to use your MMP as the attribution source of record, with Tapper filtering invalid events before they enter the system.

Protect other industries on Mobile App

Tapper covers fraud protection for every major vertical on Mobile.

E-commerce

Protection on Mobile

Stop paying for fraud on your insurance campaigns

Book a demo and we will show you exactly what Tapper would block on your account, before you commit to anything.

Book a demoAll Mobile protection